Does Amjet Aviation act as a principal or owner in transactions?

No. Amjet Aviation maintains a strict policy of No Inventory Ownership. We act as pure agents and fiduciaries, ensuring our interests are 100% aligned with the client to achieve maximum net proceeds without the conflict of flipping aircraft.

What is the difference between an aircraft broker and a trading desk?

A trading desk buys and sells assets for its own profit. Amjet Aviation has no internal trading desk; we are independent advisors who never profit from the 'spread' in a back-to-back sale, providing complete transparency to our clients.

Why is Conflict-Free Representation important in aircraft sales?

Conflict-free representation ensures your broker isn't pressured by volume-based mandates or trading favors with other firms. This model guarantees that your aircraft is marketed to the widest possible audience to secure the best market terms.

Amjet Aviation

Ethics without temptation requires more than a code of conduct.

Most ethics frameworks in this industry are built on self-governance — commitments made by individuals operating within structures that constantly create the temptation to act otherwise. Amjet was built differently. Our ethics are not a promise we ask the principal to trust. They are an institutional architecture — a firm structured under a Purpose-Built Mandate™ in which the conflict of interest cannot enter at the level of design.

The difference is not intent. It is architecture.

A code of conduct is a set of commitments individuals make to act in accordance with stated standards — despite operating within structures that may create financial incentives to do otherwise. An institutional foundation eliminates those incentives structurally, so that compliance is not a daily act of will but a condition of the firm's design.

The difference is the difference between asking someone to resist temptation and building an environment where the temptation does not exist. This page documents that environment.

The structural commitments described on this page — a single disclosed fee, single-principal representation, and the structural absence of every form of indirect compensation (inventory positions, internal trading, reciprocal deal-flow obligations, volume incentives, undisclosed fee arrangements, and service-provider referral fees) — are not background principles left to interpretation. They are terms. A principal engaging Amjet will find the same language in the agreement they sign that they found on this page.

The five commitments above are not background principles left to interpretation. They are terms — each appears in substance in the engagement agreement a principal signs. The Ethics Statement and the legal instrument are aligned by design, because they are built from the same Purpose-Built Mandate™.

What Amjet commits to publicly, Amjet documents formally. The institutional foundation and the legal instrument say the same thing because they are the same thing, expressed in two registers: one written for the principal evaluating representation, the other written for the principal who has decided to engage. Clarity before commitment is not only advice given to principals. It is the standard to which the firm holds itself.

The commitments on this page are guaranteed by the structure of the firm and by the terms of the engagement agreement, in that order. Amjet holds no inventory, operates no internal trading desk, accepts no reciprocal deal-flow obligations, sets no volume incentives, receives no undisclosed compensation, and collects no service-provider referral fees. These six structural absences are conditions of the firm's architecture, not policies that could be relaxed in a given engagement. The engagement agreement then documents them as binding terms specific to each mandate. A guarantee that depends only on intent can be withdrawn; a guarantee that depends on architecture and on contract has two independent anchors.

Undisclosed arrangements arise when a brokerage firm receives compensation from sources other than its stated client — counterparty payments, referral fees routed through related corporate structures, preferred vendor relationships, or service-provider arrangements in which the firm receives a benefit not disclosed to the principal. These arrangements are among the least visible conflicts in the industry because their existence depends entirely on disclosure by the party receiving the benefit. Amjet's response is structural: a single, transparent fee disclosed in full before any engagement begins, with no compensation accepted from any other direction.

A firm can describe itself as independent while still holding inventory, participating in reciprocal networks, or receiving compensation from multiple directions. Independence as a marketing claim describes how a firm sees itself; structural independence describes the conditions under which the firm operates. The distinction matters because The Broker Effect™ — the set of forces that shape advice and outcomes against the principal's interests — operates through structural conditions, not through self-description. A firm that has eliminated those conditions architecturally is structurally independent. A firm that has not, regardless of what it calls itself, is not.

The commitments on this page appear as terms in the engagement agreement. A principal who believes a term has not been honored has the standard recourses available under the agreement and under applicable law. In practice, the six structural conditions that produce conflict in conventional brokerage — inventory positions, internal trading, reciprocal deal flow, volume incentives, undisclosed compensation, and service-provider referral fees — are not present at Amjet to begin with, so the categories of dispute most common in the industry do not arise in the same form. The Ethics Statement is not a substitute for the engagement agreement; it is the public statement of what that agreement institutionalizes.

An Institutional Foundation.

Not a Promise.

A Code of Conduct

vs. an Institutional Foundation

Advisory first. Representation when appropriate.

A principal will know exactly what Amjet is paid, by whom, and why — before any engagement begins.

Amjet represents one principal per transaction. The counterparty is never our client.

New listings are distributed to qualified principals and flight departments for a minimum of fourteen days before broader release.

Amjet's strategic recommendation is the same whether or not a transaction results from it.

Amjet's engagement agreements reflect these conditions exactly — not approximately.

What This Statement Says, the Agreement Says.

Questions principals ask about ethics in aircraft brokerage.

What guarantees these commitments?

How are undisclosed fee arrangements possible in the brokerage marketplace?

What is the difference between independence and structural independence?

What recourse does a principal have if a commitment is not met?